Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured routing/orchestration skill that effectively delegates to role-specific specs via progressive disclosure. Its main weaknesses are the lack of explicit validation checkpoints in the multi-step coordinator→worker workflow and the somewhat verbose spawn template that uses placeholder syntax rather than fully concrete examples. The content serves its purpose as a router but could be tighter and include verification steps between phases.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow — e.g., verify task-analysis.json exists and is valid before spawning workers, and verify all worker dependencies are met before proceeding.
Integrate the QA feedback loop into the main workflow sequence rather than only mentioning it in the error handling table — show the validate → fix → re-validate cycle explicitly.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably structured and avoids explaining basic concepts, but includes some verbose sections like the full ASCII architecture diagram and the worker spawn template that could be more compact. The session directory tree and multiple tables add bulk but are mostly justified. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The role router logic is concrete ('Has --role <name> → Read roles/<name>/role.md'), the spawn template is copy-paste ready, and CLI tools are named. However, much of the content is architectural description rather than executable guidance — there are no concrete code examples for actual frontend tasks, and the worker spawn template uses pseudocode-style placeholders rather than fully executable commands. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The architecture diagram and role registry clearly show the dispatch flow (coordinator → analyze → spawn workers), and the error handling table covers failure scenarios. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints between steps — e.g., no verification that task-analysis.json is valid before spawning workers, and the QA feedback loop ('QA score < 6 over 2 GC rounds → escalate') is mentioned in error handling but not integrated into the workflow sequence. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md acts as a clear router/overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to role specs (roles/<name>/role.md) and pipeline specs (specs/pipelines.md). Content is appropriately split — this file handles routing and shared constants while deferring domain-specific instructions to role files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |