Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured orchestration skill that effectively uses progressive disclosure to manage complexity across a multi-agent pipeline. Its strongest aspects are actionability (concrete spawn templates, exact paths, CLI commands) and progressive disclosure (clean separation into role files and spec references). The main weakness is the lack of explicit validation checkpoints between pipeline stages, which is important for a multi-step destructive workflow where later stages depend on earlier outputs.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints between pipeline stages (e.g., 'Coordinator verifies scan-report.md exists and contains at least one finding before spawning diagnoser') to prevent cascading failures.
Include a brief feedback loop for worker failures — e.g., what happens if a worker reports a blocker via team_msg? Document the coordinator's retry/skip/abort decision logic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient for a complex multi-agent orchestration skill, but includes some sections that could be tightened (e.g., the ASCII architecture diagram is somewhat redundant given the role registry table, and the user commands table adds little value). The Worker Spawn Template is appropriately detailed since it's a concrete artifact Claude needs. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready Agent() spawn templates, specific CLI commands (ccw cli --mode analysis/write), exact file paths for role specs, precise session directory structures, and a complete role registry with prefixes and inner loop flags. The routing logic is explicit and unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The pipeline stages (scan -> diagnose -> design -> implement -> test) are clearly sequenced, and the role router logic is explicit. However, there are no validation checkpoints between pipeline stages — no explicit checks that scanner output is valid before diagnoser runs, no feedback loops for when workers fail or produce incomplete artifacts. The error handling table is helpful but reactive rather than preventive. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure structure: SKILL.md serves as a clear router/overview, with all domain logic delegated to roles/<role>/role.md files and specs/ references. References are one level deep, clearly signaled in tables with relative paths, and the role registry makes navigation straightforward. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |