CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

workflow-tdd-plan

Chain-loaded TDD planning. 7-phase with Red-Green-Refactor task generation.

50

Quality

54%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/workflow-skills/workflow-tdd-plan/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is admirably concise and gives executable launcher commands, but it delegates the entire multi-phase workflow to an external, unlinked phases directory with no in-body sequencing or validation, leaving workflow clarity and navigation weak.

Suggestions

Inline a brief outline of the 7 phases (or at least their names and order) so the workflow sequence is visible without following an external path.

Add a validation/checkpoint step for the pipeline output (e.g., how to confirm tests are red before green) to satisfy the feedback-loop expectation for batch/task-generation workflows.

Turn the phases reference into a clearly signaled link (e.g., 'See [phases/](./phases/)') and ensure the referenced files exist in the skill bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient with no padding or over-explanation; it assumes Claude's competence and every line (invocation commands, phases pointer, variables) earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ('chain_loader start --chain=workflow-tdd-plan'), but the listed variables (session_id, goal, auto_yes, conflict_risk) are not bound to usage examples, leaving a minor gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Only a rough structure is present (two entry commands: full pipeline vs verify-only); the actual 7-phase sequence is entirely externalized to a phases/ path with no in-body steps and no validation checkpoints.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is short and organized, and the phases reference is one level deep, but it is a bare path with no link and the referenced content is not part of the skill bundle, so navigation is not clearly signaled.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear 'what' using a specific TDD vocabulary, but it omits any 'when to use' guidance and leans on tooling jargon rather than natural user triggers, which limits trigger quality and completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers (e.g., 'Use when the user asks to plan test-driven development work or generate Red-Green-Refactor tasks').

Replace or gloss the jargon term 'chain-loaded' with phrasing a user would actually say, and include synonyms like 'test-driven development' alongside 'TDD'.

Spell out a couple more concrete planning actions to lift specificity from domain-naming toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('TDD planning') and a concrete framework ('7-phase with Red-Green-Refactor task generation'), but stops at 1-2 concepts rather than comprehensively listing the planning actions. Third-person voice is used correctly.

3 / 5

Completeness

A clear 'what' is present (chain-loaded TDD planning, 7-phase Red-Green-Refactor task generation) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'TDD' and 'Red-Green-Refactor' are recognizable, but 'chain-loaded' and '7-phase' are tooling jargon a user would not naturally utter; natural phrasings like 'test-driven development' or 'write tests first' are absent.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'TDD planning' with Red-Green-Refactor is somewhat specific, but the description could still overlap with other TDD or general planning/workflow skills since no unique trigger is given.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.