CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cekura-coordinator

Use when the user asks "what can Cekura do", "what commands are available", "help me with Cekura", "what skills do I have", "show me Cekura features", "what's available", "how do I use Cekura", or needs guidance on which Cekura skill to use for their task. Also relevant as the entry point when a user has just installed cekura-skills for the first time.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./cekura/skills/cekura-coordinator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured coordinator skill that effectively maps user needs to specific skills and commands. Its main strength is actionability — the routing tables are clear and unambiguous. Its main weakness is redundancy: the same skill-to-task mappings appear in at least three sections (Available Skills, Routing Guide, and Next Steps), consuming unnecessary tokens without adding new information.

Suggestions

Consolidate the routing guide, available skills table, and next steps into a single comprehensive routing table to eliminate redundancy and save ~40 lines.

Remove the 'Performing Platform Actions' section — Claude already understands to prefer available tools over describing API calls when tools are configured.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is mostly efficient with good use of tables, but there's significant redundancy — the routing guide, available skills/commands, and next steps sections all repeat the same skill-to-task mappings. The 'Performing Platform Actions' section explains things Claude should already understand about tool usage. Could be tightened by ~30%.

2 / 3

Actionability

Highly actionable for a routing/coordinator skill. Every user need maps to a specific skill or slash command. The routing table is concrete and unambiguous — Claude knows exactly which skill to invoke for each scenario. No code is needed since this is a routing skill, not a code skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 'Typical User Journeys' section provides clear, numbered sequences for different user scenarios (new user, has agent, needs improvement, production monitoring). The routing guide provides unambiguous decision logic. For a coordinator skill, the workflow is well-structured with clear sequencing.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill references many other skills and commands appropriately, and links to external docs. However, the content itself is somewhat monolithic — the routing guide, user journeys, and next steps all contain overlapping information that could be consolidated. No bundle files are provided, so all content lives in one file, which is acceptable for a coordinator but the redundancy hurts organization.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

62%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description excels at defining when it should be triggered, with extensive natural-language trigger phrases, but completely fails to describe what the skill actually does. It reads as a pure trigger list without any capability description. Adding a clear 'what' statement would significantly improve it.

Suggestions

Add a leading sentence describing what the skill does, e.g., 'Lists all available Cekura skills, describes their capabilities, and helps users choose the right skill for their task.'

Restructure to lead with capabilities (the 'what') before the 'Use when...' clause to follow the pattern of strong descriptions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description does not list any concrete actions or capabilities. It only describes when to trigger, not what the skill actually does. There are no specific actions like 'lists available commands' or 'displays skill documentation'.

1 / 3

Completeness

The 'when' is thoroughly covered with explicit trigger phrases, but the 'what' is almost entirely missing. The description never explains what the skill actually does — it only says when to use it, not what actions it performs.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger phrases users would say: 'what can Cekura do', 'what commands are available', 'help me with Cekura', 'what skills do I have', 'show me Cekura features', 'how do I use Cekura'. These are very natural phrasings.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The skill occupies a clear niche as a help/overview/entry-point skill for the Cekura system. The trigger terms are specific to meta-level questions about available skills and capabilities, making it unlikely to conflict with task-specific skills.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cekura-ai/cekura-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.