Use when the user asks to "improve a metric", "run labs", "leave feedback on a metric", "add to labs", "fix metric accuracy", "review metric results", "find misaligned metrics", or "iterate on metric quality". Covers the metric improvement cycle, the feedback workflow, and the labs pipeline used to refine metric accuracy over time.
65
77%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./cekura/skills/cekura-metric-improvement/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required workflow reads evaluation call transcripts and explanations from the Cekura observability call-log endpoints (e.g., list_calls/evaluate_calls/get call details), where those call logs are ultimately outsider-authored user/agent content and can be posted/queued by a provider user without the workflow selecting a specific trusted item first.
af2ceb6
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.