Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and cleanly organized for a simple skill, but it lacks executable code for the core pattern-detection logic and fails to signpost the available reference files.
Suggestions
Add a small executable example (e.g. using pyharmonics) showing how a pattern is detected and a signal emitted, so the core action is copy-paste ready.
Link the existing reference files from the body — e.g. 'PRZ trade rules: See [PRZ交易.md](references/PRZ交易.md)' and 'XABCD ratios: See [XABCD形态.md](references/XABCD形态.md)' — to make progressive disclosure explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — a compact Fibonacci ratio table plus terse concept/parameter/signal sections, with no padding explaining what Fibonacci ratios or harmonic patterns are. Not score 2 because nothing reads as unnecessary or in need of tightening. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete pip install command, a parameter table, and a signal convention, but gives no executable code for the core task of actually identifying XABCD structures or generating signals — it describes rather than instructs the central action. Not score 1 because some concrete guidance is present; not score 3 because the key operation lacks copy-paste-ready code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections and an unambiguous single action, which the rubric's simple-skills note allows to score 3 without explicit multi-step workflows. Not score 2 because no destructive or batch operation requires validation checkpoints here. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Bundle reference files exist (references/PRZ交易.md and XABCD形态.md) but the body never links to or signals them, leaving their connection implicit — content that elaborates PRZ and XABCD detail is inline rather than clearly pointed to the reference files. Not score 1 because the body itself is reasonably sectioned; not score 3 because references are not clearly signaled or navigable. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |