Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, highly actionable, and well-organized for a simple instruction skill. The only notable gap is the absence of an explicit validation/feedback loop in the rewriting workflow.
Suggestions
Turn step 4 into an explicit validation checkpoint with a feedback loop: after checking format compliance, specify re-invoking rewrite_to_screenplay if it fails the scene-header or dialogue-format rules.
Add a brief format-compliance checklist (e.g., scene headers present, dialogue uses '角色名：（状态）台词', no camera language) to make the step-4 check concrete and repeatable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives rewriting principles, a concrete format example, format rules, a step sequence, and notes without explaining basic concepts or padding, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a fully specified format template with a worked example, explicit format rules (scene header syntax, dialogue format), and a concrete tool-call sequence (read_episode_script → rewrite_to_screenplay → save_script), giving copy-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps with tool calls form a clear sequence and step 4 is a check, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint or error-recovery loop (what to do if the result fails the format check), so checkpoints remain implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained, well-organized single file with clear sections and no nested references; with no bundle files needed, this appropriately fits the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |