Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean audit playbook with concrete paths, workflow archetypes, and an exhaustive design-checks table, plus strong progressive disclosure through one-level references. The main improvement area is converting some check questions into explicit verification procedures.
Suggestions
Convert a few high-value design checks from questions into concrete verification steps (e.g., how to confirm a declared operation is mounted and callable by its intended caller).
Add an explicit evidence-gathering checkpoint in the Audit Method that names the specific artifacts to capture (path + line reference) before moving to the Report step.
Clarify how to verify a finding is a confirmed defect versus an open question with a short decision rule, so the report's three buckets are unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no explanation of what protobufs or APIs are, and every section (scope, method, design checks, evidence, report) earns its place. It explicitly favors linking over copying ("Link to those rules instead of copying them"). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete guidance — specific source paths ("public protobufs under proto/chatto/"), named workflow archetypes (bot, independent chat client, admin tool, JSON-only integration), and a detailed design-checks table with concrete questions. It is instruction-only so code absence is not penalized, but several checks are framed as questions rather than procedures, leaving minor gaps versus fully executable steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Audit Method is a clear 4-step sequence (map → trace → apply checks → compare against documented limits) with checkpoint markers ("checked, not applicable, or not checked") and a verification section. It lacks explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops, but the read-only audit nature does not require the destructive/batch cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to detailed material via well-signaled, one-level-deep references (sibling SKILL.md rules and docs under docs/), and explicitly instructs linking rather than inlining. No bundle files are present, but content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |