Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, action-first style guide with concrete Bad/Good pairs and a clear pre-send checklist; it assumes Claude's intelligence and avoids padding. Its only weakness is mild repetition around the compression-vs-correctness rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and skill-tight, assuming Claude's competence and avoiding textbook explanation of what APIs or frameworks are; a few sections (e.g. the long 'Never ADD word to sound caveman' paragraph) restate the same compression point multiple ways and could be trimmed, landing just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete Before/After ('Bad'/'Good') pairs and specific commands like 'Run npm test -- auth.spec.ts' make the rules executable and copy-pasteable; it is instruction-shaped rather than code-shaped, and the guidance is mostly concrete with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Pre-send check' and numbered 'Rules' sections sequence the response-construction process with explicit checkpoints (delete announcing first sentence, verify first/last line test), and 'When to break the style' covers error-recovery branches; it is not a destructive/batch workflow so the validation cap does not apply, and it stops short of 5 only because the main flow is presented as a checklist rather than a fully chained validate->fix->retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections (Style, Rules, When to break, Pre-send check, Boundaries) and no bundle files or external references, which for a sub-50-line-equivalent single-purpose skill matches the simple-skill 5 anchor for well-organized content needing no external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |