Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill body with strong validation and feedback loops. Its main weakness is conciseness/progressive disclosure: large blocks duplicate or belong in reference files rather than SKILL.md.
Suggestions
Move the full theme-choice-hints block (lines 60-73) and the compact theme list into references/options.md, keeping only a pointer and the current default selection rule inline.
Trim the 使用规则 catalog by extracting the detailed layout:query/inspect:layout/props:safe flag recipes into a references/workflow-commands.md, leaving a concise rule summary in SKILL.md.
Reduce the inline JSON structure example to the minimal shape and point to references/examples/annual-review.json or portfolio.json for the full reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely action-dense with minimal concept padding, but duplicates the theme list (compact plus full theme-choice-hints block, mirroring references/options.md) and runs long in the rule catalog. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable commands with real flags ('npm --prefix <skill-root>/project run layout:query -- --theme ... --item-count 4 ...') plus a concrete inline JSON structure example cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 15-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (validate:goal-spec, validate:swiss, validate:goal-copy, validate:four-variant-quality), feedback loops (待修正/阻塞), and a checklist section. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure with signaled one-level references to real bundle files (references/layout-roles.md, assets/skill/theme-style-grid.png), but substantial content that belongs in references (full theme hints, large 使用规则 catalog) is inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |