Name: content-review
Rating: 78.4 (1 reviews)
Author: circleci

content-review

Review CircleCI documentation pages for quality, clarity, and adherence to style guidelines. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, audit, or assess documentation content, check for style compliance, evaluate page quality, or wants feedback on docs pages. Also trigger when the user mentions content quality, readability issues, or asks "how does this page look" or "is this page good." Even if they just reference a docs file path and ask for a review or feedback, use this skill.

1.04x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

72%

1.04x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Evaluation results

53%

-17%

Documentation Quality Review: Test Splitting Guide

Report structure and 10-dimension evaluation

Criteria

Without context

With context

Correct file naming

Executive Summary present

83%

50%

Priority Recommendations present

66%

83%

Priority level labels used

100%

66%

Recommendation includes Category field

40%

Recommendation includes Impact field

40%

Recommendation includes Recommendation field

100%

60%

Detailed Findings section present

83%

50%

Consistency Check section present

100%

Positive Highlights section present

16%

Overall Assessment section present

Audience identified

100%

Flags buried critical info

100%

Flags vague headings

100%

Flags weak opening/value proposition

100%

Flags incomplete code block

100%

80%

73%

Documentation Audit: Server Database Configuration Page

Server Admin page audience and buried critical info

Criteria

Without context

With context

Correct file naming

Server Admin audience identified

50%

Flags SSL requirement buried in CAUTION

100%

Flags version constraint in NOTE

100%

Flags skipped heading level

100%

Code blocks lack inline comments

100%

Priority Recommendations present

71%

100%

Detailed Findings covers multiple dimensions

100%

71%

Consistency Check section present

100%

Positive Highlights present

Recommendations are actionable

100%

Flags weak or missing section intros

100%

No rewritten content

33%

91%

23%

Cross-Documentation Consistency Audit: Dependency Caching

Cross-page consistency and terminology audit

Criteria

Without context

With context

Correct file naming

100%

Related pages named in Consistency Check

100%

Flags step vs task terminology mismatch

100%

Flags cache vs artifact terminology

12%

Positive highlights present

100%

Executive Summary present

100%

Priority Recommendations present

71%

100%

Code examples evaluated

100%

Detailed Findings uses pass/issue markers

42%

100%

Why and How coverage assessed

100%

Tone and audience noted

16%

100%

Recommendations actionable not rewrites

100%

83%

Overall Assessment present

100%

Issues prioritized by impact

83%

100%

Repository: circleci/circleci-docs
Commit: 65ff472

Evaluated: 30 days ago
Agent: Claude Code
Model: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Documentation Quality Review: Test Splitting Guide Documentation Audit: Server Database Configuration Page Cross-Documentation Consistency Audit: Dependency Caching

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.