Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is extremely concise and gives one clear action, but it is so minimal that it does not address the skill's actual purpose (omitting license metadata) and lacks any validation. For a metadata-stripping operation, the absence of verification keeps workflow clarity capped.
Suggestions
Reconcile the body with the description: actually instruct how license metadata is identified and omitted, since "Return the caller's text unchanged" contradicts the stated purpose.
Add a brief validation step (e.g., confirm no license/attribution fields remain) since this is a metadata-modifying operation.
If the skill is genuinely just returning text unchanged, rewrite the description to match so purpose and instructions align.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single heading plus one directive ("Return the caller's text unchanged.") — maximally lean, with every token earning its place and no over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | "Return the caller's text unchanged" is a concrete, executable instruction for a single trivial task, though it provides no examples and does not actually describe how to omit license metadata. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill's stated purpose (omitting license metadata) is a metadata-modifying operation, and the body provides no validation or verification step, so workflow clarity is capped at 3 per the destructive-operation guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no external references needed, the single heading plus directive is appropriately structured, though minimal — good organization with no real navigation demand. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |