Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced operational skill: exact wiring recipes, per-package gotchas, and a mandatory verify-and-trim-check loop with feedback. Its only weaknesses are minor — a redundant opening paragraph and a scaffold step that leans on mirroring an example app instead of literal file contents.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The recipe table, gotchas, and verify commands are dense and earn their tokens; assumes Claude's competence throughout ('read and adapt, don't invent'). Not 5: the opening paragraph restates the frontmatter description, and the gather-inputs prompts are slightly chatty — minor trims remain. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete base-file list, a per-package recipe table with exact env vars and shim paths, and copy-paste 'pnpm install / --filter … run typecheck / build' commands. Not 5: the base scaffold step directs to 'Copy the shape of apps/moderator — read those files and adapt names' rather than providing literal content, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly labeled steps in order, with an explicit validation gate in §5 ('Both must pass' — typecheck and build) and a trim-check feedback loop (remove dep → reinstall → re-run both) covering error recovery. Not 4: validation checkpoints and the retry loop are explicit, not implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A 'Source of truth' section signals one-level-deep references with each file's purpose and an explicit instruction to read rather than restate; shim snippets are deferred to package READMEs; no bulk reference material is inlined. No bundle directories exist, and the single-file structure with well-organized sections fits the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |