Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable, well-structured instruction body: the workflow is unambiguous with concrete tool calls, an early-exit condition, and an exact output format. The only improvement space is removing the small rule duplication between the workflow and the Rules section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes competence, and explains nothing Claude already knows; the only bloat is the duplicated irrelevant-file rule appearing in both Step 1 ('Do NOT load files that are clearly irrelevant') and the Rules section ('NEVER load irrelevant files'). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact file_reader and terminal commands, an explicit no-match response string, and a verbatim return-format template; minor gaps remain (e.g., how the task/topic is passed in is not specified). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-step sequence with an explicit early-exit checkpoint ('If nothing matches, immediately return...') and a hard stop ('Stop immediately after returning the summary'); the operation is read-only so no validation loop is required. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file, ~50-line skill with well-organized sections and no content that belongs in external reference files, satisfying the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |