Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-structured with copy-paste-ready format and concrete examples; the only gap is the absence of an explicit sequenced workflow with a feedback loop, though the checklist partially compensates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and tightly focused on project-specific commit guidance with no padding about what git or commits are; every section (rules, principles, format, examples, checklist) earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready HEREDOC format block plus concrete good and bad examples with explicit problem callouts and a pre-commit checklist, giving fully executable guidance that covers the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action is unambiguous and the 'Checklist Before Committing' provides a verification checkpoint, but there is no explicit multi-step sequence or validate-fix-retry feedback loop, leaving it just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no need for external references and is organized into clearly labeled sections (7 Rules, Key Principles, Format, Examples, Checklist), satisfying the well-organized-sections bar for a simple single-file skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |