Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and highly actionable, with a concrete output template, scoring rubric, and safety rules, and it is well-organized for a single-file skill. The main gap is workflow clarity: the multi-step triage process is implied by section order rather than stated as an explicit sequenced workflow with checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered 'Process' section (e.g. 1. Fetch open issues + previous state, 2. Dedupe, 3. Score P0–P3, 4. Write issue-triage-state.md, 5. Stop — do not apply labels) so the sequence is explicit.
Insert a validation checkpoint before writing state — e.g. confirm proposed labels are on the L2 allowlist and that no P0/P1/security labels are auto-applied.
Note explicitly how to reconcile 'New since last run' and 'Open actionable' counts from the prior state file to make the state-update step unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — tables, a compact output template, and terse rules — and assumes Claude's competence without explaining concepts it already knows; every section earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: an exact output markdown template, a P0–P3 scoring table, an allowlisted-label list, and explicit escalation rules — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process (scan, dedupe, score, write state, propose) is implied across the Inputs/Output/Scoring/Rules sections but is not laid out as an explicit numbered sequence, and there are no validation checkpoints between gather and write. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized SKILL.md under ~60 lines with clear sections and no need for external references; per the simple-skills note this earns a 3 on well-organized structure alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |