Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction skill with a clear output template and example invocation, but the triage procedure itself is under-specified and lacks a validation step. Adding a short sequenced method and a self-check would lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a brief sequenced triage procedure (e.g. gather inputs → dedupe against state file → classify by impact → assign to High-Priority/Watch/Noise) so the action is unambiguous.
Include a validation/self-check step, such as confirming every High-Priority item has an impact rationale and a suggested next action before emitting the report.
Give one concrete worked example of a triaged item across all four output sections to anchor the abstract format.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized into Inputs, Output Format, Rules, and Example Invocation, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The output template and the example invocation command are concrete, but the actual triage methodology — how to gather, deduplicate, and prioritize the inputs — is left abstract, so guidance is incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The output sections (1–4) are clearly laid out, but there is no sequenced process for performing the triage itself and no validation checkpoint confirming the report is complete and honest. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clearly labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |