Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured tool-reference skill that is highly token-efficient and self-contained. It could improve actionability with concrete call examples and make its validation workflow explicit.
Suggestions
Add one or two example tool invocations with argument values (e.g., a diagnostics or goto_definition call) so usage is copy-paste ready rather than implied from the parameter list.
Frame the rename safety flow as an explicit sequence: validate with lsp.prepare_rename, then apply lsp.rename, re-running diagnostics afterward.
Make the post-edit verification loop explicit (edit → lsp.diagnostics with severity:"error" → fix → re-check) instead of leaving it as a scattered tip.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient at ~35 lines: a tight tool list with one-line descriptions, a single config example, and two tactical tips, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete tool names with required parameters and a copy-paste config block, but is reference-style — it lacks example invocations showing actual tool calls with argument values, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Encodes sequence and checkpoints as prose tips (status-first recovery, post-edit diagnostics verification, prepare_rename before rename), but these are scattered rather than an explicit numbered feedback loop, and the validate→apply loop for rename is hinted not framed. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, self-contained with no bundle files, and organized into clear Tools and Config sections — meeting the simple-skill exception where well-organized sections alone earn a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |