Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally actionable, clearly sequenced process directive with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops. Its main weakness is verbosity and a monolithic structure that keeps reference-grade detail inline rather than split into bundle files.
Suggestions
Split the long subagent-routing, manual-QA-channel, and verification-gate sections into reference files (e.g. references/subagents.md, references/qa-channels.md) and keep SKILL.md a lean overview that links one level deep, improving both conciseness and progressive_disclosure.
De-duplicate the failing-first proof rule and cleanup-receipt rule, which each appear across four or five sections; state each once authoritatively and reference it, to reduce token load.
Consolidate the three overlapping subagent-reliability sections (Codex subagent reliability, TOML-backed routing, subagent-dependent transition barrier) into a single sequenced reference to remove repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids explaining basics Claude already knows and encodes novel tooling rules, but at roughly 470 lines it restates the same directives repeatedly — the failing-first proof rule recurs in Goal, Tier triage, Execution loop, Constraints, and Stop rules, and subagent-reliability guidance spans three long sections — so it could be tightened substantially without losing meaning. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It is rich with concrete, executable guidance: literal commands ('NOTE=$(mktemp -t ulw-...)', 'git log --oneline -20', the full web-terminal-visual-qa.mjs invocation), named tools (create_goal, update_plan, multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent, codegraph_explore, rg, sg), and a concrete todo format 'path: <action> for <criterion> — verify by <check>'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints: a four-step Bootstrap that must complete first, an 8-step PIN→RED→GREEN→SURFACE→CLEAN loop, mandatory RED-before-GREEN evidence, LSP diagnostics, cleanup receipts as completion gates, and feedback loops (reviewer loop, re-validate on fix, the 2-attempt stop rule). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is internally well-organized with clear section headers, but it is a monolithic ~470-line SKILL.md with no bundle files and no external references, and substantial portions (subagent routing tables, QA channel detail, verification-gate procedure) are inline material that the progressive-disclosure philosophy would split into one-level-deep reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |