CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ultrawork

Binding ultrawork mode directive for omo on Codex. When a prompt contains ultrawork or ulw, the omo UserPromptSubmit hook injects a short bootstrap that points at this file. Read the whole file and follow every rule in it for the rest of the task.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a highly actionable, well-sequenced process directive with strong workflow clarity and explicit validation checkpoints. Its weaknesses are length/repetition and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure to offload the denser reference material.

Suggestions

Extract the channel-specific QA recipes (HTTP/TUI/browser/computer-use, the xterm.js visual QA command) and the multi_agent v1/v2 schema-compatibility tables into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview that links one level deep.

De-duplicate the failing-first proof and cleanup rules, which are restated nearly verbatim across Execution loop, Constraints, and Stop rules; consolidate into one canonical section and reference it.

Reduce ALL-CAPS emphatic repetition (MANDATORY, NEVER SKIP, NON-NEGOTIABLE, DO ALL FOUR) where a single firm statement carries the same force, to trim token cost without losing the rule.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Information-dense directive text that largely assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basics, but it is very long with repeated emphasis (MANDATORY, NEVER SKIP, NON-NEGOTIABLE) and restates the failing-first proof and cleanup rules across the Execution loop, Constraints, and Stop rules sections.

3 / 5

Actionability

Gives concrete commands and exact tool invocations (mktemp notepad, node .../web-terminal-visual-qa.mjs, kill -0, rg, curl -i, page.click(...), update_plan, create_goal), with named subagents and literal scenario contracts; minor gaps come from a few abstract directives without a concrete command.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The PIN->RED->GREEN->SURFACE->CLEAN loop is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (RED before production code, LSP diagnostics clean, cleanup receipts required, reviewer re-review up to twice), feedback loops for error recovery, and a tier-gated verification procedure.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single monolithic file with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references; substantial content that could be split out (channel-specific QA recipes, subagent schema compatibility notes) is inlined, though headers provide some internal structure.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and complete, clearly stating what the skill is and when it activates via explicit, low-conflict trigger terms. Its only minor weakness is that 'what it does' is framed as load-and-obey rather than as an enumerated capability set.

Suggestions

Consider adding a short clause that names the concrete capabilities the directive governs (e.g. evidence-first verification, tier triage, cleanup discipline) so the 'what' reads as a capability list rather than a load-and-obey instruction.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the concrete mechanism ('UserPromptSubmit hook injects a short bootstrap that points at this file') and the action ('follow every rule in it'), but the actions are about loading/obeying rather than an enumerated capability list, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (a binding mode directive injected by a hook pointing at this file) and when ('When a prompt contains ultrawork or ulw') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Provides the primary natural trigger term plus its abbreviation synonym ('When a prompt contains ultrawork or ulw'), giving comprehensive coverage of the terms a user would actually type for this niche.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tied to a unique trigger token and a specific surface ('omo on Codex') with a dedicated hook, giving it a clear niche with minimal risk of triggering for the wrong skill.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
code-yeongyu/lazycodex
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.