Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is tight, executable, and well-organized for a simple single-purpose skill. Its main weakness is that destructive/batch operations (kill, group sends) lack an explicit validation checkpoint, capping workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before destructive/batch actions, e.g. run 'ai-devkit agent detail --id <name> --json' and confirm the agent/task before 'kill' or group 'send'.
Make the 'verify completed work' step concrete with a command or acceptance check (e.g. re-run 'detail --tail 20' and confirm exit status) rather than leaving it as a directive.
Flag the broadcast/group send rule with an explicit pre-check that every member truly applies, to satisfy the batch-operation feedback-loop expectation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, command-focused body with no padding about what agents are; a few assignment rules and the workflow intro could be tightened slightly, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable commands with exact flags plus a concrete worked 'agent send' example, copy-paste ready and covering the common cases per the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered workflow exists with inspect-before-acting and verify-before-reporting, but for destructive/batch operations (kill, group broadcast) validation is implicit rather than an explicit checkpoint command, so the destructive-skill cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clear sections (Workflow, Commands, Assignment Rules), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |