Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, highly actionable skill body: concrete commands, a well-sequenced contract with real validation checkpoints and error-recovery loops, and disciplined brevity with no concept padding. The only gap is the absence of example commit messages and a concrete default validation command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's git competence — every sentence adds operational guidance (commands, scope rules, failure handling) with zero concept explanation or padding, matching the anchor-5 example's economy. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste commands appear throughout ('git status --short --branch', 'git diff --cached --stat', 'git add path/to/file') plus an explicit message format, but no example commit messages are shown and validation is delegated to 'the repo's targeted tests' without a concrete default command — minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step Commit Contract has a clear sequence with explicit validation before committing (step 3), re-check checkpoints (steps 1 and 5), and feedback loops for error recovery — validation failure stops the commit and reports output, and hook failures get an isolate-then-retry procedure. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple under-50-line, single-purpose skill with well-organized sections (Contract, Guardrails, Message Style) and no bundle files — nothing needs to be split out, so it fully meets the simple-skill standard for this dimension. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |