Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured procedural skill: concrete commands, explicit validation gates, and a feedback loop back to dev-design. The only gaps are implicit tooling specifics in the coverage steps and no explicit test-pass confirmation checkpoint within the write-tests sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: every step is an imperative instruction with no concept explanations or padding ('Run `npx ai-devkit@latest lint` before phase work', 'Gather context: feature name, changes summary, environment'), fully assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands (`npx ai-devkit@latest lint --feature <name>`) and a concrete path-resolution fallback via `.ai-devkit.json`, but steps like 'Run coverage tooling' and 'Analyze the testing template' leave tooling and doc specifics implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps with an upfront lint gate, an explicit validation rule ('Apply the `verify` skill before making coverage or test-pass claims'), and a feedback loop ('If tests reveal design flaws, return to `dev-design`'). Not 5 because the write-tests steps lack an explicit re-run-until-green checkpoint inside the loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (under 50 lines), single-purpose skill with no bundle files and no external references needed; content is appropriately split into well-organized 'Phase Contract' and 'Write Tests' sections with clear next-step navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |