Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is extremely concise but underspecified: it delegates to two other skills without explaining how they combine or what the session produces. Conciseness is excellent, but actionability and workflow clarity suffer from the near-total lack of concrete guidance.
Suggestions
Spell out the orchestration: how /grilling and /domain-modeling interact, what inputs to seed the session with, and what outputs (ADR + glossary entries) to produce.
Add a short concrete workflow with a validation checkpoint, e.g. confirm the plan is sufficiently sharpened before writing the ADR and glossary entries.
Include a minimal example of the expected artifacts (an ADR stub and a glossary entry format) so the delegation is actionable rather than just directional.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The single line "Run a `/grilling` session, using the `/domain-modeling` skill." is maximally lean with no padding or over-explanation; every token is functional, so it earns the top conciseness score. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names two skills to invoke but gives only a high-level hint; the concrete steps for how to run the grilling session and how /domain-modeling is meant to be used are missing, so it falls at the minimal-guidance anchor. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple delegating skill the single action is mostly identifiable, but the relationship between /grilling and /domain-modeling is not explained and there are no checkpoints, so it sits at the middle anchor rather than the simple-skill 5. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files and no file references to navigate, and the body has no section structure; for a tiny skill this is acceptable but not well-organized enough to score above the midpoint. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |