Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-organized delegation protocol with a clear step sequence and an explicit halt-on-failure checkpoint. Its only weakness is actionability: the steps direct what to do but leave the concrete mechanism for loading cs-feat unspecified.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well under 50 lines, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line states a directive or a maintenance constraint, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The four numbered steps give concrete directional guidance (load cs-feat, carry the stage intent, do not re-prompt the user, halt on load failure), but the actual loading mechanism is left abstract with no tool, command, or example, leaving a key detail unspecified. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The execution rules are a clearly sequenced 1–4 list with an explicit failure checkpoint in step 4 ('停止并报告兼容入口不可继续'), which for a simple delegation skill satisfies the top anchor's sequence-plus-checkpoint requirement. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is short and single-purpose with no need for bundle files (none present), and content is organized into clearly labeled '执行规则' and '维护规则' sections, which meets the under-50-lines well-organized anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |