Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured compatibility shim with a clear sequenced execution path and an explicit load-failure guard, respecting token budget and avoiding concept over-explanation. Its only weak spot is actionability: the mechanism for loading cs-feat is described abstractly rather than as an executable step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (shim intent, entry intent, execution and maintenance rules) earns its place, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete directive guidance (load cs-feat by installed name, carry requested_stage: qa, do not re-prompt, stop-and-report on failure), but the actual load mechanism is left abstract with no executable command or example, leaving it incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered execution rules form a clear sequence with an explicit failure guard (rule 4: stop and report if the main protocol cannot load); for a simple single-purpose routing skill, the single action is unambiguous and check-pointed, meeting level 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At well under 50 lines with no need for external references and two cleanly organized sections (执行规则, 维护规则), this simple skill qualifies for level 3 under the simple-skills scoring note; no bundle files are present or needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |