Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-organized delegation protocol with a clear sequence and an explicit failure checkpoint, appropriate for a simple compatibility-entry skill. Its only gap is that the mechanism for loading the authoritative protocol is not spelled out.
Suggestions
Specify concretely how to load cs-epic (e.g. the exact invocation or lookup step) so the actionability is copy-paste ready rather than implied.
Clarify what '报告兼容入口不可继续' should contain so the halt step produces a useful, consistent error message.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: short numbered rules with no concept explanation or padding, where every line (load cs-epic, carry the stage intent, don't re-prompt, halt on failure) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The directives are concrete in intent ('加载 cs-epic 作为权威主协议', '带上入口意图 requested_stage: goal-package', '停止并报告'), but the actual loading mechanism is left unspecified, so key execution details are missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four execution steps are clearly sequenced and include an explicit halt-and-report checkpoint (step 4) on load failure; for a simple single-purpose delegation skill this meets the clarity bar. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external bundle references, and is organized into clear '执行规则' and '维护规则' sections, satisfying the simple-skill progressive disclosure bar. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |