Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written orchestrator body with strong executable commands, a clear sequenced workflow, validation checkpoints, and a re-run feedback loop. The only weak spots are minor redundancy in the summary block and the absence of local bundle files to demonstrate file-level progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what code review is), but the Must/Should/Nice-Fix-open summary block is duplicated across Step 2 and Step 3 and 'When to stop' restates the Step 3 loop condition — minor trim opportunities that keep it just below the 'every token earns its place' 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (git rev-parse, npx @cognite/cli apps skills pull x2, curl fallback x2, Glob path) plus a concrete output-file table and report template, covering the runner's common cases; not 4 because there are no real gaps in the executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Pre-checks -> Step 1 -> Step 2 -> Step 3 -> When-to-stop sequence with an explicit Step 3 verify checklist, a re-run feedback loop until 'Must Fix open: 0', and a curl error-recovery fallback; the destructive/batch 3-cap does not apply since the skill explicitly forbids applying fixes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned overview that delegates the detailed bar one level deep to flows-review-checks, clearly signaled via pull commands and a Glob path, with content appropriately split between runner and bar; held at 4 rather than 5 because no local bundle structure exists and the summary block is duplicated, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |