Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and has a well-sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints. The main gap is progressive disclosure: advanced content is deferred to a code/ bundle that is not present in this review set, so the references cannot be verified.
Suggestions
Ensure the referenced bundle (skills/graph-viewer/code/ and code/README.md) ships alongside the skill so the 'Advanced Reference' pointers resolve to real, one-level-deep files.
Consider adding a brief one-line summary of what code/README.md contains so readers know whether to open it before navigating into the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: short prerequisite list, numbered workflow, a single minimal code example, a compact dependency table, and a focused cost section — no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready minimal example, concrete import path, an executable install command with versioned packages, and specific config knobs (whitelistedRelationProps, initialConnectionLimit, maxNodes, coreReverseQueries) with their tuple shape. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps ending in a typecheck/build validation step, plus an explicit Verification Checklist with feedback items ('tsc --noEmit and the app's build both pass'), giving clear checkpoints for a fragile copy-integration operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body references 'code/README.md' and 'code/' for advanced details, which is well-signaled, but the referenced bundle directory (skills/graph-viewer/code/) is not present in the review bundle, so the referenced paths cannot be verified to exist one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |