Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, decision-oriented body that gates a rare exception path with concrete probes and guardrails. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids padding, with only minor actionability gaps from deferring wiring detail to an external doc.
Suggestions
Add a minimal inline useAtlasChat wiring snippet so the core step is executable without loading the external doc.
Add an explicit verify/observe step after wiring (e.g., confirm the chat renders in-app and the product UI is preserved) to close the batch/completions feedback loop.
State the expected failure signal when connectToHostApp rejects so the 'standalone-only' branch is unambiguous to detect.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout — no padding, no explaining what Atlas/EOS/sidebar are; every line is a decision or guardrail that earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete probe criteria, the hook to wire (useAtlasChat), a doc URL, and explicit numeric limits/cache key, but the actual wiring implementation is deferred to the external doc rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered gating workflow with an explicit probe checkpoint ("do not continue" if the sidebar works; "ask" if unsure) and default-to-sidebar fallback; the secondary batch-completions guidance has guardrails but no explicit validate/verify loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized numbered structure and no bundle files needed; references are one-level (external doc URL, sibling skill) and clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |