Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is commendably terse but over-delegates: it points Claude to an external doc without providing executable guidance, a step sequence, or validation steps, and relies on an external URL instead of bundled references.
Suggestions
Inline the key installation steps (component scaffolding and useAtlasChat hook wiring) as concrete, copy-paste-ready code or commands instead of deferring entirely to the external URL.
Add a short numbered workflow with a validation checkpoint (e.g., confirm the chat streams a test message before considering integration complete).
Bundle the guide's essential details into a local reference file (e.g., references/integration-guide.md) and link to it one level deep, so the skill does not depend on a live external URL that may rot.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The four-line body is extremely lean and assumes Claude's competence, adding no padding or concept explanation Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, specific pointer ("Follow the guide at https://docs.cognite.com/...") but no in-skill executable code, commands, or copy-paste examples, leaving the actual integration steps unspecified. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single high-level instruction (follow the guide, use the $ARGUMENTS agent external ID) is clear, but the multi-step work the description promises (install, structure, wiring) is given no in-body sequence and no validation/verification checkpoint. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has a heading and minimal structure, but it depends on a live external web URL rather than bundled reference files, and there is no one-level-deep reference organization to navigate. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |