Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete code and a clear step sequence, but it is held back by missing validation checkpoints in the workflow and a lack of genuine progressive disclosure — the cited 'code/' bundle files are absent and large reference material is inlined rather than split out.
Suggestions
Add explicit verification checkpoints after the fragile steps — e.g., after Step 4 run the dev server and confirm the pdfjs worker resolves, and after Step 3 confirm `pdfjs-dist` is hoisted for pnpm — to lift workflow clarity.
Either provide the missing `code/` bundle files referenced in Step 2 (the nine `code/*.ts(x)` files) or remove/correct the references, so the skill's external structure is real.
Move the 'Full props reference' and 'Tips & tricks' sections into a separate reference file (e.g., `references/props.md`) referenced one level deep, to reduce inline length and improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining known concepts, but the inline 'Full props reference' and 'Tips & tricks' sections make it a dense ~280-line single file that could be tightened; not level 3 because it is not lean, and not level 1 because it is not padded with concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout — per-package-manager install commands, exact Vite config, copy-paste imports and usage, a typed full-props example, and a pitfalls table with concrete fixes — matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Step 1–5 with 'Complete these steps in order') but there are no explicit validation checkpoints for the fragile config/worker setup; per the rubric, missing verification steps in build/config manipulation caps workflow clarity at 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is reasonably sectioned, but the 'Full props reference' and tips are inline content that could be split out, and the referenced 'code/' bundle (Step 2 lists nine files) does not exist on disk; no real one-level-deep references are present, so it is not the well-split level 3 but not a disorganized wall of text either. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |