Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable deprecation workflow with explicit validation and feedback loops. Its main weakness is repeated restatement of the version-removal policy across several steps and a monolithic single-file structure.
Suggestions
State the full-major-undisturbed (M+2) policy once in Step 2 and reference it from Step 1, Step 3, and Step 5 rather than restating the rationale in each.
Consider extracting the JSDoc/metadata examples and in-repo reference pointers into a references/ file linked from a shorter overview, to reduce SKILL.md length.
The version-table example is tied to specific package versions (9.14.0, 10.0.0); keep these as illustrative but note they are examples so they don't read as time-sensitive current state.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what JSDoc or Nx is), but the full-major-undisturbed policy is restated across Step 1, Step 2, Step 3, and the Step 5 checklist, which could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an exact JSDoc template, the required closing sentence, @deprecationExpectedRemoval format, concrete metadata JSON warning strings, file paths, and the executable `yarn nx run <project>:lint` command — copy-paste ready for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Step 0–6 sequence with an explicit verification checklist (Step 5) and a required lint feedback loop in Step 6 ('Fix any reported issues before finishing'), satisfying validation for this batch/multi-package operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into labeled sections with no nested references and in-repo example pointers at the end, but all content lives inline in SKILL.md with no separate reference files split out for a body this length. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |