Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable two-phase workflow with concrete tooling guidance and explicit feedback loops; its main weakness is moderate verbosity from verbatim example dialogue scripts that could be condensed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the full verbatim greeting scripts, example confirmation block, and wrap-up quote add unnecessary length that could be tightened without losing clarity. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance — named tools (Figma MCP, Read, EnterPlanMode/ExitPlanMode, Linear MCP), a specific discovery question list, a detailed plan-section checklist, and concrete Linear issue fields — with only minor gaps such as the absence of a sample plan template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two phases are clearly sequenced with explicit feedback loops (loop back in discovery, confirm before Phase 2, Linear-MCP-unavailable fallback), missing only an explicit self-validation step confirming the plan is complete before ticket creation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear hierarchical headers across phases and guidelines, and content is appropriately inline for a conversational workflow with no bundle files; at ~120 lines a few example templates could be trimmed but structure is genuinely navigable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |