Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable body with a clear validated workflow and concrete tooling, held back only by mild verbosity from a repeated boundary disclaimer and a diagram that restates the step list.
Suggestions
State the read-only boundary once (e.g. in the Boundaries section) and remove the repeats in the intro and Step 5 to recover tokens.
Drop or shrink the dot diagram since the numbered Step 1–5 headings immediately below already convey the same sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and assumes competence, but the read-only boundary is restated three times ("It is read-only", "Do not edit anything", "Read-only: no test edits") and the dot diagram duplicates the numbered step list that follows, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands and validated MCP call signatures (gh run download … -n test-results-v2, npx playwright show-trace, list_launches(projectId: 1, …)), fully executable with specific examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step loop with a diagram, explicit classification decision logic, and graceful-degradation checkpoints ("Skip history gracefully when TestOps isn't reachable"); operations are read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the single self-contained SKILL.md is appropriate; sections are well-organized and the only external pointer is a one-level cross-skill handoff to writing-e2e-tests. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |