Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, concise body with a clear overview and intended one-level-deep references. Its main weakness is that the referenced template.md and style-guide.md files are absent, leaving the core HTML generation incomplete and navigation broken.
Suggestions
Add the missing template.md and style-guide.md bundle files (or inline the essential HTML template and SRI hash) so the core generation step is executable from SKILL.md alone.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g., open the generated HTML and confirm it renders / screenshots cleanly before declaring done) to give the workflow a feedback loop.
Keep the concrete output-path and git-common-dir guidance, but pair it with a minimal inline HTML skeleton so the action is copy-paste ready even if a reference file is unavailable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what HTML or diagrams are — and each section (Output, Required Sections, Section Selection, Common Gotchas) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete output path and a git command, but the actual HTML generation depends entirely on referenced template.md and style-guide.md, which are missing, leaving the core task without inline executable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are sequenced and selection rules are clear, but there is no validation checkpoint for a workflow that writes files and uses Playwright/html2canvas, only guardrail gotchas rather than an explicit render-and-verify loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Reference Files section correctly signals one-level-deep pointers to style-guide.md and template.md, but those files do not exist in the bundle, so the navigation is broken despite good structural intent. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |