Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable MCP calls, seed scripts, and a validated multi-step workflow including feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are mild verbosity in a few rationale passages and a monolithic structure that inlines reference-grade material rather than splitting it out.
Suggestions
Tighten or trim rationale passages (e.g., the 'Why this is the right primitive' note and the 'Two reasons:' enumeration in step 2) so the body assumes Claude's competence more fully and scores higher on conciseness.
Move the per-page seed-patterns table and associated gotchas into a references/ file (e.g., SEED-PATTERNS.md) linked from the step, giving the skill one-level-deep progressive disclosure and shortening the core SKILL.md.
Confirm bundle files referenced by path (e.g., ooxml/scripts/validate.py-style helpers) actually exist under references/scripts/assets; none were found in this bundle, so either add them or remove dangling path references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and project-specific rather than generic, but includes explanatory asides such as 'Why this is the right primitive:' and the 'Two reasons:' list in step 2 that could be tightened, matching the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than the lean 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance: real MCP calls (browser_snapshot, browser_evaluate with concrete JS), a copy-paste TypeScript seed script, and a runnable scratch test — meeting the 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 10-step procedure with an explicit verification loop in step 8 ('read the failure trace', categorized failure modes) and feedback branches (method works? -> retry selector; selector unstable -> flag FE), matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized (When this applies, The procedure, Step-by-step 1-10, Anti-patterns), but the ~280-line body is monolithic with no bundle files and reference-ish content (the per-page seed-patterns table, gotchas) kept inline, fitting the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than the one-level-deep reference ideal. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |