Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced procedure with real tool calls, executable seed/verification code, and strong error-recovery guidance. It loses points on token efficiency (the dot flowchart duplicates the step-by-step section) and on progressive disclosure — everything lives inline in one long file with no reference bundle despite length that would benefit from splitting.
Suggestions
Drop the `dot` digraph (or the 'Step-by-step' prose) — they state the same procedure twice and cost ~34 lines of context; the anti-pattern table already provides the at-a-glance failure mapping.
Move the per-page 'Reusable seed patterns' table, the beforeunload/dialog protocol, and the data-testid naming conventions into references/ files (e.g., references/seed-patterns.md) linked one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as the procedural overview.
De-duplicate the dialog-blocking guidance between step 3 and the anti-patterns table — state the rule once and cross-reference it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence (no library tutorials) but the ~34-line `dot` flowchart fully duplicates the 10-step 'Step-by-step' section, and the dialog-blocking explanation is repeated at length in both step 3 and the anti-patterns table. That is section-level redundancy, which fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the 4 anchor's 'minor instances'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: real MCP tool invocations (browser_handle_dialog(accept=true), the browser_evaluate enumeration script, test_run), a runnable TS seed script, a copy-paste selector priority list with named fallbacks, and a concrete scratch verification test. Matches 'copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Ten clearly sequenced steps with an explicit verify-then-diagnose feedback loop (step 8 maps timeout → wrong selector, assertion failure → wrong method logic, multiple matches → add scope), plus an anti-pattern table mapping failure symptoms back to the skipped step. Clear sequence with explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops — the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), so the ~280-line body is monolithic: the per-page seed-pattern table, the dialog-handling protocol, and the data-testid naming conventions are exactly the content a one-level-deep reference file would hold. Sections are well-organized, but 'content that should be separate is inline' fits the 3 anchor; the under-50-lines exception does not apply to this length. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |