Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized workflow that assumes competence and gives concrete guidance with built-in verification checkpoints. The main gap is the absence of explicit error-recovery feedback loops and any runnable code or command examples.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop for the prediction step (e.g., if confidence metrics fall below a threshold or chain coverage is poor, adjust inputs/settings and re-run), which would lift workflow_clarity to the top anchor.
Include one concrete runnable example or command/payload skeleton for a common execution route (e.g., a minimal FASTA-to-structure invocation) to push actionability toward fully executable.
Optionally note where detailed reference material lives (even a one-line pointer to a references file) if the skill grows beyond this single-purpose scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every step earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific instruction-only guidance (named metrics pLDDT/PAE, listed execution routes, defined outputs) but no copy-paste runnable code or commands, sitting between actionable instruction and fully executable examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence with verification checkpoints (step 2 'Verify the execution route before running', step 5 comparison/audit), but lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, so it does not reach the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill (under 50 lines, no external references needed) with well-organized sections (intro, numbered workflow, outputs), qualifying for the top anchor under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |