Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and clearly actionable, with an unambiguous workflow for a simple skill. The only improvement would be showing the exact 'feynman alpha' command syntax instead of a placeholder.
Suggestions
Replace the 'feynman alpha ...' placeholder with a concrete, copy-paste-ready command example (e.g. the actual subcommand and argument form) to lift actionability to fully executable.
Optionally add one short worked example showing the six-section structure applied to a sample paper, so the expected output shape is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and token-efficient with no padding; it assumes Claude's competence, never explains concepts Claude already knows, and every line (tool-call pointer, answer structure, guidelines) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance — a specific shell invocation pattern ('feynman alpha ...', not a bare global 'alpha') and a fixed six-section answer structure — but 'feynman alpha ...' is a placeholder rather than copy-paste-ready executable syntax, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines, its single action is unambiguous: branch on paper-vs-topic input, anchor on a representative paper, and fill the named section structure, with no destructive or batch operations requiring validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no need for external references, the body is well-organized into headed sections and bullets; no bundle files are present or needed, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |