Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable body that assumes Claude's competence and supplies copy-paste commands, exact budgets, and worked examples rather than concept explanations. It is well-structured but slightly longer than necessary and lacks an explicit error-recovery loop in its workflow.
Suggestions
Trim the Common mistakes table to the highest-value rows or fold the rarest mistakes into their owning section, to reduce body length without losing the actionable fixes.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint in the Workflow (e.g., after drafting, re-read the body against the Shape and per-block caps before applying) to reach the score-5 workflow anchor.
Consider moving the Optional headings list and the assets-branch image recipe into a short reference section or file so the core Shape stays scannable, improving progressive disclosure toward one-level-deep references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and free of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a PR/git' padding), but the Common mistakes table and Optional headings list add length that is useful yet could be trimmed slightly; mostly efficient with minor over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: copy-paste git commands for the assets branch, `gh pr edit <n> --body-file <file>` / `gh pr create --body-file`, `gh pr diff <n>`, exact word budgets per block, and a concrete worked decision example — covers the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section gives a clear numbered sequence with concrete commands per step and an explicit 'show it, and wait' user checkpoint, but it lacks a formal validate→fix→retry error-recovery loop; minor validation gap relative to the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Shape, The parts, Size, Optional headings, Images, Workflow, Common mistakes) with no nested references and an appropriately scoped body; no bundle files exist to verify, and the single-file structure is mostly appropriate though the skill exceeds the 50-line simple-skill exception. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |