Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, concise CLI skill with fully executable commands and concrete examples. Its only meaningful weakness is the clone/create workflow, which performs a write operation without an explicit validation or verification checkpoint.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the clone workflow, e.g. re-run `cx dashboards get <new-id> -o json` after `cx dashboards create --from-file` to confirm the new dashboard was created with the intended structure.
Validate the exported JSON before re-creating, e.g. check that `cx dashboards get` produced valid output and that the modified file still parses, so a malformed definition is caught before the create call.
Consider merging the "CLI Commands" and "When to Use Each Command" tables into one goal→command→flags table to remove the remaining overlap and tighten the token budget further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and table-driven with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what a dashboard or Coralogix is); every section earns its place. The two command tables reframe the same info as goal→command and command→purpose mappings rather than padding, keeping it efficient. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands with key flags plus concrete, copy-paste-ready examples such as `cx dashboards search "payment service error rate"` and `cx dashboards query-search --field '$d.http.status_code'`, matching the anchor for fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The core search→inspect flow is clear and includes a soft feedback loop ("try several phrasings if the first search returns nothing useful"), but the clone workflow (`get` JSON → modify → `create --from-file`) performs a write operation with no validation or verification step that the create succeeded or the JSON is valid. Per the rubric, a missing verification step in a write/destructive operation caps workflow clarity at 2; it is not a 3 because of this gap, and not a 1 because the sequence itself is well ordered. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is compact (under ~60 lines), has no bundle files and no need for external references, and is organized into clearly labeled sections (CLI Commands, When to Use, Examples, Key Principles, Related Skills), which earns a 3 for a simple skill with well-organized sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |