Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured with an executable check, a concrete fix, and a validation test; the only minor gap is that the validation retry loop is implicit rather than an explicit numbered feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean Trigger/Fix/Why structure with no generic concept explanation; every section (the rg command, the Go fix snippet, the repo-specific rationale) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance — a copy-paste `rg` search, a concrete Go fix line with naming/comment guidance, and a named test (TestPriorSchemasStayFrozen) with its path — covering the common case end to end. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (widen -> rg check who calls it -> give prior version a frozen copy -> run the test) with an explicit validation checkpoint and failure diagnosis, but the fix-and-re-validate feedback loop is implied rather than spelled out as a numbered retry. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (<50 line), self-contained skill with no external references needed and well-organized Trigger/Fix/Why sections, qualifying for the simple-skill exception at the top of the scale. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |