Use when diagnosing why a Terraform plan is not empty, an attribute is unknown, or a plan modifier misbehaves, without Coralogix credentials. Drives PlanResourceChange directly in a unit test.
71
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Trigger: You need to know what the provider plans for some attribute, and an acceptance test would need CORALOGIX_API_KEY and minutes per run. Plan-time behavior (plan modifiers, defaults, unknown marking) never calls the API, so it can be measured offline in milliseconds.
Recipe: in package provider, a _test.go file:
server, _ := testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories["coralogix"]()
schemaResp, _ := server.GetProviderSchema(ctx, &tfprotov6.GetProviderSchemaRequest{})
object := schemaResp.ResourceSchemas["coralogix_<name>"].ValueType().(tftypes.Object)
// build prior/config/proposed with tftypes.NewValue; null for every attribute you do not set
resp, _ := server.PlanResourceChange(ctx, &tfprotov6.PlanResourceChangeRequest{
TypeName: "coralogix_<name>", PriorState: enc(prior), Config: enc(config), ProposedNewState: enc(proposed),
})
planned, _ := resp.PlannedState.Unmarshal(object) // also read resp.RequiresReplace, resp.DiagnosticsEmulating core: you supply ProposedNewState yourself. Terraform's rule (plans/objchange): config value where set; for Computed attributes with a null config, the prior value — unless the prior object contains a non-computed attribute, which means it came from config.
Why: it isolates the provider from the backend, so a diff between two runs is caused by your change, not by API state. Compare variants by toggling the schema and re-running, and delete the file when done — it is a probe, not a test.
coralogix/terraform-provider-coralogix
8110e9e
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.