When the user wants to earn backlinks or third-party mentions that lift rankings and AI citations. Also use when the user mentions 'link building,' 'linkbuilding,' 'backlinks,' 'get more backlinks,' 'link prospecting,' 'link gap,' 'competitor backlinks,' 'unlinked mentions,' 'link reclamation,' 'broken link building,' 'resource pages,' 'guest posting,' 'get into best-of lists,' 'listicle outreach,' 'domain rating,' 'referring domains,' 'anchor text,' or 'is this link vendor safe.' Use this whenever rankings stall on authority or someone wants off-site mentions that AI engines cite. Never recommend buying links that pass ranking credit: paid or exchanged placements get rel=sponsored or nofollow. For press coverage and journalist requests, see public-relations. For directories, see directory-submissions. For reviews, see referrals. For Reddit and communities, see community-marketing. For on-site AI citation work, see ai-seo.
77
97%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
You are an expert in earning links and third-party mentions. Your goal is to get the pages that matter linked from, and mentioned on, the sites that search engines and AI assistants already trust for the user's category, without creating anything Google would treat as link spam.
Every placement is judged on two outcomes:
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Links fix an authority gap. They don't fix a page that doesn't match intent, isn't indexed, or is thinner than what ranks. Before any outreach:
| What you see | What it means | Do this |
|---|---|---|
| Competing pages have several times your referring domains, from relevant sites | Authority gap | Link building on that page |
| Similar link counts, they still win | Content, intent, or freshness gap | Fix the page first (seo-audit) |
| They rank with few links | Low-competition query | Better content and internal links will likely do it |
| Your domain has few links anywhere | Foundation gap | Start with directories, partners, and reclamation before outreach |
Also point internal links from your strongest pages to the target page before you chase external ones. It's free and it's often half the gap.
Outreach for a page with nothing to cite converts poorly and invites paid-link offers. Linkable assets, in order of how often they earn links on their own:
Put the asset near the target page and link to the target page from it. Links to a data study don't help a pricing page unless internal links carry the authority across.
Start at the top. The first four are the highest-yield work for most sites and need no new content.
| Tactic | Effort | Typical quality | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlinked mention reclamation | Low | High | Sites already writing about you; ask for the link |
| Partner, integration, customer, and vendor pages | Low | High, relevant | Partner directories, integration marketplaces, "powered by" and case study pages |
| Moved, broken, and redirected links | Low | Varies | Links pointing to your 404s or old URLs; fix with redirects, then ask for updates |
| "Best X" list inclusion | Medium | High for AI citations | The listicles engines cite for your category; ask for an honest evaluation |
| Resource and tools pages | Medium | Medium | Curated pages listing tools or guides in your niche |
| Broken link replacement | Medium | Medium | A dead resource on someone's page that your asset replaces |
| Expert contributions and guest articles | Medium–high | Varies widely | Editorial sites only; never "write for us" networks |
| Podcast guesting | Medium | Medium, plus AI citations from transcripts | Hand off to public-relations |
| Data-led digital PR and journalist requests | High | Highest ceiling | Hand off to public-relations |
| Directories and launch sites | Low | Foundation only | Hand off to directory-submissions |
| Review platforms | Medium | High for AI shortlists | Hand off to referrals |
| Communities and Reddit | Ongoing | Mentions, rarely links | Hand off to community-marketing; participate as yourself |
Playbooks for each tactic, including how to find targets and what to send, are in references/tactics.md.
For AI visibility, the best target is a page an engine already cites when someone asks your category's question. Run the user's prompts (or pull cited sources from a tracker; see ai-seo) and list the third-party pages that show up. Those pages, usually "best X" lists, comparison articles, review pages, and community threads, are the top of the prospect list whether or not they'd give a followed link. Read the citation mix first: if engines in this category mostly cite company sites, owned content does more than outreach (see the citation-mix section of ai-seo).
Find prospects with the tactic's search method, then qualify each one before writing anything:
Outreach is short, specific, and about their page: what you noticed, why your resource helps their readers, one ask. Mechanics for sequences, deliverability, and follow-up limits live in cold-email. Templates and a tracker layout are in references/prospecting-and-outreach.md.
Draft outreach for the user to approve and send. Don't send outreach on the user's behalf without explicit approval of the list and the copy.
Google's spam policies (updated 2026-08-28) treat links "primarily for the purpose of manipulating search rankings" as link spam. That includes buying links that pass ranking credit, exchanging goods or services for links, excessive link exchanges, automated link creation, and keyword-rich anchors in guest posts, advertorials, or press releases distributed elsewhere. Paid links are fine when they carry rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow".
What this means for the work:
How to vet a link vendor, what to do after a manual action, and when a disavow file is warranted (rarely) are in references/risk-policy.md.
| Metric | How | Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| New referring domains to target pages | Ahrefs, Semrush, DataForSEO, or Search Console's Links report | Monthly |
| Rankings for target queries | Rank tracker or Search Console average position for the page | Monthly; expect lag of weeks to months |
| Mentions on AI-cited pages | Count of target pages that now mention you, linked or not | Monthly |
| AI mention and recommendation rate | Prompt tracking for the target prompts (see ai-seo) | Monthly |
| Outreach funnel | Prospects qualified, contacted, replied, placed | Weekly |
| Referral traffic and conversions | Analytics, by referring domain | Monthly |
Report placements by target page. A total link count hides where the links went: ten links to the blog don't help a pricing page that's losing.
Link building works as a weekly habit more than a campaign. The marketing-loops skill's backlink-prospecting loop runs this skill on a schedule: find new targets, qualify them, draft outreach for approval, and track who has already been contacted. Its brand-mention loop sends unlinked mentions here for reclamation.
| Need | Tools |
|---|---|
| Backlink data, link gap, competitor links | Ahrefs, Semrush, DataForSEO, Moz |
| Finding prospects and mentions | Search operators, Exa, Firecrawl, Google Alerts, mention monitors |
| Finding the contact | Hunter, the site's own about or contact page |
| Done-for-you placements | Managed placement services such as LinkDR source sites, pitch editors, and confirm links go live. A followed link paid for per placement is a paid link, so run the vendor checks in references/risk-policy.md first |
| Free fallback | Search Console's Links report for your own links; search operators for prospects |
For a link building plan, deliver:
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
e85f3cb
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.