Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, domain-expert body that leads with compliance, gives exact numbers, timings, and copy patterns, and cleanly pushes depth into four well-signaled one-level-deep reference files. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy between 'Common Mistakes'/'Task-Specific Questions' and earlier sections, and the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'Task-Specific Questions' section into 'Before Starting' (they cover the same context) and trim 'Common Mistakes' items that restate points already made in-line, to lift conciseness from 4 to 5.
Add one or two explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow, e.g., 'verify final copy stays within the planned segment budget (160/70 chars)' and 'confirm STOP/HELP keyword handling on the selected platform before recommending it', to lift workflow_clarity from 4 to 5.
Name compliance setup (TCPA consent copy, A2P 10DLC registration review) as an explicit deliverable in the description, not just as trigger terms.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every line carries domain-specific facts Claude would not reliably know (segment pricing '$0.0075–$0.04', quiet hours, A2P 10DLC registration rules, benchmark tables), and it does not explain basics Claude already knows. However, the 'Common Mistakes' section repeats points already made ('Discount on first abandoned cart message', quiet hours, A2P registration), and 'Task-Specific Questions' duplicates the 'Before Starting' context gathering — minor trims available, fitting 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' (4) rather than 'every token earns its place' (5). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact timings ('send 30 min after cart abandon, 4 hours later if no purchase, 24 hours later with discount'), a complete copy example with sender ID and compliance footer, character budgets (160 GSM-7 / 70 UCS-2), a UTM format to copy, numeric decision rules ('list <10K = 10DLC'), and a defined 6-part output format. Matches anchor 5; a 4 would require gaps in coverage of common cases, and none are evident. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced: context gathering ('Before Starting') → compliance gate ('Flag blockers first' in the Output Format) → strategy → sequence design → platform → measurement, mirroring the Output Format checklist. Not 5: there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops (e.g., verify copy ≤ segment budget or confirm STOP/HELP handling on the chosen platform before finalizing a plan); the compliance check is a gate but has no 'check → fix → re-check' structure. Not 3: the sequence and its gating are far more complete than a bare step list. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with four real, one-level-deep reference files ('For full compliance details, edge cases... see references/compliance.md', plus whatsapp.md, sequence-templates.md, platforms.md), each clearly signaled at the point of need and verified to exist; none chain onward to further files. Deep material (templates, platform deep-dives, jurisdiction detail) is appropriately split out, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |