CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

packmind-skill-creator

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

61

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/packmind-skill-creator/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, actionable meta-skill with a clear sequenced workflow, real bundle scripts, and an explicit validation feedback loop. Its main weaknesses are mild verbosity in the conceptual overview and prerequisites, and the absence of reference files to offload the explanatory bulk from SKILL.md.

Suggestions

Trim the 'About Skills' overview and OS-by-OS prerequisite install instructions to the essentials Claude does not already know, tightening conciseness toward the top anchor.

Move the detailed skill-anatomy and bundled-resource guidance into a references/ file (e.g., references/skill_anatomy.md) and reference it from SKILL.md, practicing the progressive disclosure the skill itself advocates.

Add a brief concrete template or worked example to Step 4 ('Edit the Skill') so the editing guidance is executable rather than purely question-based, closing the actionability gap.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation Claude can infer (e.g., 'Skills are modular, self-contained packages... Think of them as onboarding guides') and verbose OS-by-OS prerequisite install instructions, matching the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ('python3 scripts/init_skill.py', 'python3 scripts/quick_validate.py', 'packmind-cli skills add') backed by real bundle scripts, but Step 4 ('Edit the Skill') leans on abstract guiding questions rather than executable specifics, a minor gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 7-step process with a dedicated validation step and an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop is present, but only Step 5 carries a real checkpoint while Steps 4 and 6 lack per-step checkpoints, fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-organized with clear section headers and well-signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files (scripts/init_skill.py, scripts/quick_validate.py), but the sizable conceptual 'About Skills' content is inlined rather than split into reference files, a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear, third-person, and explicitly covers both what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete trigger phrasing. It is slightly light on enumerating multiple specific concrete actions and on natural-term synonyms, which keeps specificity and trigger coverage just below the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('creating effective skills') and 1-2 concrete actions ('create a new skill (or update an existing skill)'), but does not enumerate a comprehensive list of specific actions, matching the anchor for naming domain plus a couple concrete actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('Guide for creating effective skills') and when ('This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill)...') with a concrete trigger clause, matching the anchor that clearly and explicitly answers both.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say are present ('create a new skill', 'update an existing skill', 'specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations'), giving good keyword coverage though a few natural synonyms like 'build a skill' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Skill authorship is a clear, distinct niche with trigger terms unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, though as a meta-skill it has minor conceptual overlap with any other skill-management tooling.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 12 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
cteyton/packmind
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.