Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, highly actionable operational guide with concrete state schemas, spawn parameters, and feedback loops for error recovery. Its only weakness is mild verbosity in a few prose-heavy sections and limited use of external reference splitting.
Suggestions
Tighten the Enabling and How-to-consult prose into terser step lists to reduce token weight without dropping the concrete fields and parameters.
Consider moving the detailed briefing-template usage into the existing reference and keeping only a short pointer plus redaction rule inline, to deepen progressive disclosure.
The Choosing-the-model resolution rules repeat across Commands and Enabling; consolidate to one place and cross-reference to cut redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Instruction-dense and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but several prose blocks (the long Enabling paragraph, the How-to-consult elaboration) could be tightened without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: an exact copy-paste state.json schema, concrete spawn parameters (subagent_type, model, description, run_in_background), exact commands, and per-verdict actions covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered Enabling and How-to-consult sequences with explicit checkpoints and explicit feedback loops (resume fails -> spawn fresh; Task tool rejects slug -> read valid slugs from error and pick closest; verdict stop -> rethink). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ("Build the briefing from `references/briefing-template.md`", a real file), though the body still carries considerable inline operational detail rather than splitting more into references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |