Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced orchestration workflow with explicit validation, feedback loops, and failure handling, organized cleanly in a single short file. The main drag is token efficiency: the model-selection fallback logic in Phases A and C is convoluted run-on prose that could be compressed into a short decision table.
Suggestions
Rewrite the Phase A step 3 runner fallback chain as a compact decision table or ordered fallback list (configured entry -> family default -> closest valid slug -> drop seat) instead of nested run-on sentences.
Compress the Phase C judge-selection fallbacks similarly, keeping only the key rule (judge never from the parent's family) plus a short fallback order.
Add one minimal example of a Phase B spawn call (task + grounding path + output path + rationale request) to make the fan-out step copy-paste concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The phase instructions are lean imperatives, but the runner and judge fallback chains ("If the Task tool rejects a configured entry, run that seat on its family's default... If dropped seats leave fewer than two runners, add runners until there are two...") are dense run-on conditional prose that could be a compact decision table — mostly efficient but clearly tighten-able. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics abound: spawn all N in one message with run_in_background: true, per-candidate paths like /tmp/arena-<slug>/candidate-<n>/, exact model slugs, and a 3-6 criterion rubric. Minor gaps: no example spawn call or task-prompt template, and a few directives stay abstract ("pick the base a future maintainer can extend most easily"). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases A-F are explicitly sequenced with a per-phase todolist checkpoint up front, verification is a dedicated phase with feedback loops ("go back to Phase E", "Reframe and re-run"), and failure paths (dropouts, rejected judge slugs) are handled — matching the anchor for clear sequence, explicit validation, and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At roughly 43 lines with well-organized sections (Phase A-F, Outputs) and no bundle files, the skill qualifies for the simple-skill exception; its cross-references to other skills (poteto-mode, prove-it-works) are clearly signaled and one level deep. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |