create-learning-path

Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is concise, well-structured, and easy to navigate for a simple instruction-only skill. Its main weakness is actionability: the workflow steps are abstract and lack concrete examples or output templates.

Suggestions

Make the workflow steps actionable with concrete guidance, e.g. example milestone structures, a checkpoint template, or specific practice-exercise formats.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g. confirm each milestone is achievable within the stated schedule before finalizing the plan).

Specify concrete output formats for the plan, assignments, and progress rubric rather than leaving them as bare list items.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: short workflow steps, terse guardrails, and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	"Use Ask user tool." is concrete, but the workflow steps describe rather than instruct ("Assess baseline knowledge", "Sequence topics") with no specific examples, templates, or concrete deliverable formats, leaving the guidance incomplete.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The five steps are clearly sequenced and step 5 ("Review progress and adjust pacing") acts as a light feedback loop, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints for verifying milestones are achievable or progress is on track.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the body is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Trigger, Workflow, Tools, Guardrails, Output), which per the guidelines lets a simple skill score 3 on progressive disclosure.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and third-person with a clear domain, but it omits any explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance and only partially enumerates concrete actions. It is a competent but incomplete description.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause naming natural trigger phrases users would say (e.g. study plan, learning plan, skill roadmap).

List more concrete actions to raise specificity, e.g. "assess baseline, sequence topics, define milestones, generate practice exercises".

Sharpen the trigger terms with common user phrasings like "learning plan" or "study schedule" to reduce overlap with generic planning skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints" names the domain and a few actions (build, milestones, checkpoints) but does not list multiple distinct concrete actions, matching the score-2 anchor rather than the multi-action score-3 example.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states what the skill does but includes no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the guidelines caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like "learning roadmap" and "practice checkpoints" are relevant, but common variations a user would naturally say (e.g. "study plan", "learning plan", "study schedule") are missing, so coverage is partial rather than comprehensive.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"Personalized learning roadmap" is a recognizable niche, but it could still overlap with general planning or goal-setting skills, so it is not yet a clearly conflict-free trigger.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: cursor/plugins
Commit: 0452e08

Reviewed: 14 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.