create-learning-path

Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints

Quality

37%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./teaching/skills/create-learning-path/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

42%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a reasonable high-level structure for creating learning paths but lacks the concrete, actionable detail that would make it truly useful. The workflow reads more like a description of what to do rather than specific instructions with examples, templates, or sample outputs. The organization is clean but the content is too abstract to guide Claude effectively.

Suggestions

Add a concrete example of a completed learning roadmap (e.g., a sample week-by-week plan for learning Python) to make the output expectations clear and actionable.

Include a template or schema for the output format—e.g., a markdown table with columns for Week, Topic, Practice Exercise, Milestone, and Review Criteria.

Add specific questions to ask the user during the 'Assess baseline knowledge' step, and define concrete criteria for how to adjust pacing in the review step.

Include a feedback loop: after each milestone review, specify what triggers a plan adjustment vs. proceeding to the next phase.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is relatively brief and doesn't over-explain concepts Claude already knows, but phrases like 'Building capability in a topic over multiple sessions' and some of the guardrails are somewhat generic and could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	The workflow is entirely abstract and descriptive—'Assess baseline knowledge,' 'Sequence topics,' 'Define milestone projects'—without any concrete examples, templates, sample outputs, or specific formats. There is nothing copy-paste ready or executable.	1 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Steps are listed in a logical sequence, but there are no validation checkpoints, no feedback loops for adjusting the plan if a milestone is missed, and no concrete criteria for when to proceed or revise. The 'Review progress and adjust pacing' step is vague.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	For a simple, short skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Trigger, Workflow, Tools, Guardrails, Output) and doesn't need external references. The structure is appropriate for its scope.	3 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Description

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear concept—building learning roadmaps—but lacks the completeness needed for effective skill selection. It has no 'Use when...' clause, which is critical for Claude to know when to invoke this skill. The trigger terms are reasonable but miss common user phrasings for this type of request.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks for a study plan, learning path, curriculum, skill development roadmap, or wants to learn a new topic systematically.'

Include more natural trigger term variations such as 'study plan', 'learning path', 'curriculum', 'skill development plan', 'how to learn X', and 'course outline'.

Expand the specific actions listed, e.g., 'Builds a personalized learning roadmap with milestones, practice checkpoints, resource recommendations, and progress tracking criteria.'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names a domain (learning/education) and a specific action (build a personalized learning roadmap), and mentions components like milestones and practice checkpoints. However, it doesn't list multiple distinct concrete actions—it's essentially one action with qualifiers.	2 / 3
Completeness	The description answers 'what' (build a learning roadmap with milestones and checkpoints) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2, and the 'when' is entirely absent, warranting a 1.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Contains some relevant keywords like 'learning roadmap', 'milestones', and 'practice checkpoints' that users might mention, but misses common variations like 'study plan', 'curriculum', 'learning path', 'skill development', or 'course plan' that users would naturally say.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The concept of a 'personalized learning roadmap' is somewhat specific and distinguishable from generic education skills, but could overlap with skills related to project planning, goal setting, curriculum design, or general educational assistance.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: cursor/plugins
Commit: cfd81b3

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.