create-learning-path

Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints

Quality

57%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./teaching/skills/create-learning-path/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise and well-structured for a simple planning skill, but its workflow steps are abstract directives rather than concrete, executable guidance. Adding specific formats or templates for milestones and checkpoints would materially improve actionability.

Suggestions

Make the workflow steps concrete and executable: specify how to elicit baseline/target (e.g., specific Ask-user questions), a format for milestones, and a structure for practice checkpoints with feedback criteria.

Add an explicit review/adjust checkpoint with a concrete trigger (e.g., "After each milestone, compare progress to the schedule and adjust pacing with the user") to introduce a feedback loop.

Provide a minimal output template (e.g., week/topic/milestone/practice columns) so the produced plan is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~30-line body is lean with short numbered steps, brief guardrails, and no padding or re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place.	5 / 5
Actionability	Steps like "Assess baseline knowledge" and "Sequence topics from fundamentals to applied practice" are high-level directives rather than executable guidance, and the only concrete instruction is "Use Ask user tool"; specific formats, templates, or concrete steps to execute are missing.	2 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The five workflow steps are clearly numbered and ordered, but they are abstract with no explicit checkpoints or feedback loops; this is a planning task rather than a destructive/batch operation so no lower cap applies, yet checkpoints remain only implicit.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references, and is cleanly organized into Trigger/Workflow/Tools/Guardrails/Output sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score.	5 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear purpose and a couple of concrete deliverables but provides no trigger guidance, leaving the "when to use" question unanswered. It is reasonably distinct yet somewhat generic.

Suggestions

Add a "Use when..." clause with concrete natural triggers (e.g., "Use when the user wants a multi-week study plan, learning roadmap, or skill-building schedule").

List more specific actions or outputs (e.g., "assess baseline, sequence topics, set milestone projects, add practice exercises") to lift specificity.

Include common synonyms and file/format cues users would actually say ("learning plan", "study schedule", "skill roadmap") to improve trigger term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints" names the domain plus two concrete artifacts, matching the anchor for naming a domain with 1-2 concrete actions; it does not list multiple specific actions to reach 4.	3 / 5
Completeness	The "what" is clear (build a roadmap with milestones and checkpoints) but the "when" is entirely missing with no explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like "learning roadmap", "milestones", and "practice checkpoints" are relevant but miss common user variations ("study plan", "learning plan", "skill roadmap"); no "Use when" clause is present.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"Personalized learning roadmap" is a recognizable niche but broad enough to overlap with general planning, tutoring, or study-skills skills, fitting the somewhat-specific-but-overlapping anchor.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: cursor/plugins
Path: teaching/skills/create-learning-path/SKILL.md
Commit: 51a96e0

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.