Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable specification with a clear gated workflow, validation steps, and a feedback loop. Its only weakness is monolithic inlining of reference-heavy tables that could be split into bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the symptom → log signature → fix table and/or the full hook-points table into a reference file (e.g. references/signatures.md) and link to it from the body, keeping only the most common rows inline.
Extract the redaction contract details (string/depth/array thresholds) into a brief reference file so the body stays a quick overview of the pipeline contract.
Consider a references/ folder with one-level-deep links for the stack-agnostic pseudocode variants, signaled clearly from the Install section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense: terse tables, justified pseudocode, and field thresholds; no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable curl smoke tests with expected HTTP codes, concrete jq reading recipes, exact redaction thresholds (400 chars, 4 depth, 50 items, 16000-char line cap, 200-entry buffer), and stack-agnostic pseudocode whose flexibility is explicitly justified. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five-step workflow (Map → Plan/stop → Install → Verify → Fix loop) with explicit validation checkpoints: a plan-and-stop gate, a Verify section with curl smoke tests, and a fix loop that fixes one thing, re-tests, and confirms the signature is gone before recording. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, but substantial reference material (the hook-point table and the symptom→signature→fix table) is inlined in a single ~188-line file rather than split into separate reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |